The Southern African Development Community (SADC)

COMESA must go: Mboweni

The Southern African Development Community (SADC)

 The Southern Times, 29 August 2006

 
The Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) has been called upon to disband to give way to the emergence of a Southern African Development Community (SADC) monetary union, with South African Reserve Bank governor Tito Mboweni lambasting the continent’s biggest trading bloc for being an obstacle to the attainment of a common currency in SADC.

Mboweni, pointing out that there was an overlap between COMESA and SADC’s roles as some SADC states had membership in both, called on SADC member states and the East African Community to concentrate their energies around a single currency. The South African central bank governor has been rallying support for a single monetary union for the sub-region by the year 2016 to complement the creation a free trade area by 2008, a SADC customs union by 2010, and a common market by 2015.

Overview of regional cooperation and development in Southern Africa: possibilities, problems and challenges

The Southern African Development Community (SADC)

Alternative Information and Development Center (AIDC), May 2006

Background paper prepared by the AIDC for the May 2006 "Strategic Conceptualisation and Planning" seminar of the "Peoples Dialogue" project on "Alternative Regional Strategies", to promote comparative analysis, ongoing exchanges and active cooperation between civil society organisations in Southern Africa (SADC) and South America (Mercosur).
Read

The Role of the State in Development in the SADC Region: Does NEPAD Provide a New Paradigm?

The Southern African Development Community (SADC)

Richard Kamidza, Khabele Matlosa and Allast Mwanza, Third World Network

 

Academic discourse and development policy debates have grappled with the contentious issue of the state-market interactions in Africa’s development agenda and process, particularly since the 1960s independence era. At the heart of this debate has been the contestation over agency for development: what is the key locomotive or engine of development. Two contrasting positions have emerged in this debate. One propounded mainly by the nationalist political elite, and couched in terms of economic nationalism, maintained that the state should play a central role in directing the development agenda. This strand of development thinking, thus, opted for a dirigiste development path, which has not really succeeded in Africa in general and Southern Africa in particular. The other position, which has been driven mainly by foreign capital and industrialized nations propounded a neo-liberal orthodoxy giving, as it were, pride of place to a market-based economic system in tune with economic liberalization. Since the World Bank report of 1997, there has been some considerable amount of convergence between these contrasting paradigms and some amount of consensus in the debate that state and markets are not necessarily in competition, but rather complementary agents of development. This article revisits this debate and critically interrogates the extent to which the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) presents a new paradigm in development thinking in the African continent. The principal thesis of the article is that states and markets should not be perceived as polar opposites in the development process, but rather as complementary agents of economic advancement.

The genesis of a new EUconomics theorem?

The Southern African Development Community (SADC)

Wally Roux*, March 2005

 

ANY person following the economic news in the newspapers, related publications and/or the internet, is likely to stumble across some information pertaining to the envisaged Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), especially nowadays. The EPA-proposals put forward by the European Union (EU) to the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries have in mind the replacement of the old Lome preferences with more internationally compliant trading arrangements.

The Lome Conventions were trading arrangements through which the EU afforded ACP countries preferential market access. In 1994 a trade dispute between the United States (US) and the EU over banana exports from the Caribbean was brought before the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The WTO eventually ruled that the Lome convention violated WTO rules because it gave the ACP countries an unfair trade advantage over other WTO members.

Southern African Peoples Solidarity Network (SAPSN) - Parallel to the Inter-governmental and Head of State SADC Summit

The Southern African Development Community (SADC)

MASERU, LESOTHO 14-18 AUGUST 2006

"RECLAIMING SADC FOR PEOPLES SOLIDARITY AND DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION"

Dear Fellow Members of SAPSN and friends,

It is now almost six years since SAPSN held its highly successful three-day 'non-governmental' conference parallel to the annual SADC inter-governmental meeting and Heads of State Summit that took place in Windhoek, Namibia, in August 2000. That independent SAPSN conference was also organised in parallel to the simultaneous official SADC NGO consultative meeting in Windhoek. But SAPSN held an open public meeting in Windhoek which many of the other NGOs present in Windhoek also attended. Some of these then decided to join in the 'unofficial' meeting because of its more comprehensive coverage and intensive discussions. These produced a powerful final declaration affirming the solidarity of Southern African peoples organisations and committing them to "Making Southern African Development Cooperation and Integration a People-Centered and People-Driven Regional Challenge to Globalisation". This cogent and visionary document received wide recognition and dissemination throughout the region.

Regional Economic Partnership Agreements: The Eu and Souther Africa

The Southern African Development Community (SADC)

The Implications of the EU's Proposed "Regional Economic Partnership Agreements" with Respect to Regional Integration and Development in Southern Africa

Dot Keet, Sept 2004, AIDC 

It has long been recognised in the EU and amongst the African Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) members of the Lome Convention, and expressed in the Lome Convention itself, that the grouping of countries into larger economic units is an important basis for effective and sustainable development.

In Africa, the strategic objective of re-grouping African countries and (re)integrating the continent was a fundamental reaction to the legacy of colonialism; to arbitrarily created, artificial, largely non-viable and distorted economies, characterised by pronounced under-development and deep external dependence. Regional groupings in Africa were conceived in the 1960s and 1970s as more rational economic units and formally endorsed in the Lagos Plan of 1980. These putative regions would provide larger markets and economies of scale in investment and production, with combined or complementary resources, and would generally be more effective frameworks within which to correct disarticulated and ineffective economic structures UN-ECA, 1988.

XML feed